You misunderstand. If we can't prove their existence, if they have no permits to have the building there. Then there are no legal obstacles in the way of simply destroying the building. Tearing it down and building something actually useful in its place.
no subject
If we can't prove their existence, if they have no permits to have the building there.
Then there are no legal obstacles in the way of simply destroying the building.
Tearing it down and building something actually useful in its place.